Why the Marucci Cat 5 Bat was Banned from Little League Play


The Marucci Cat 5 baseball bat was one of the most popular bats used in high school and college baseball when it was first introduced in 2009. Manufactured by Marucci Sports, the Cat 5 was a one-piece aluminum alloy bat known for its balanced swing weight, large sweet spot, and excellent performance.

Upon its release, the Cat 5 instantly became a top seller and was used by many top amateur players. Its popularity was due to the bat’s ability to hit the ball with tremendous power while still allowing hitters to swing with control. Many players chose the Cat 5 over other available bats due to the advantages it offered in their batting performance.

Performance of the Bat

The Marucci Cat 5 quickly gained popularity amongst players for its exceptional performance right out of the wrapper. According to Marucci’s blog, the CAT 5 had the highest exit velocities and provided elite power at the plate. The balanced swing weight allowed players to control the bat easily and drive the ball with authority. Testing showed that the CAT 5 produced exit velocities up to 2-3 mph faster than previous CAT models. Players reported feeling minimal vibration and maximum pop. Within months of its release, it was the top-selling bat across multiple leagues and age groups.

Marucci designed the CAT 5 to have a “hyper responsive” AZ105 alloy barrel that was precision-tuned with a ring-free multi-variable wall design, according to the company’s history of the CAT line. This optimized the barrel performance and set a new standard for alloy bats. Based on Marucci’s internal exit speed testing, the CAT 5 delivered groundbreaking alloy bat performance with consistent high exit velocities and premium power.

Approval and Subsequent Ban

The Marucci CAT 5 BBCOR bat was initially approved for use in high school and collegiate play when it was introduced in 2011. According to this video, the bat quickly gained popularity among players due to its large sweet spot and impressive performance.

However, in March 2012, just a year after its introduction, the bat was banned from NCAA and NFHS competition as per this announcement from the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association. The PIAA stated that the 33-inch model of the Marucci CAT5 BBCOR bat would be decertified immediately and no longer allowed in high school leagues.

This sudden ban came as a shock to many players who had purchased the bat. The CAT 5 had been one of the hottest bats on the market, but was now deemed illegal for high school and college play overnight.

Reasons for the Ban

The Marucci CAT 5 BBCOR bat was ultimately banned and decertified by the NCAA and NFHS due to concerns over its performance advantages and player safety issues. According to Bat Digest, the CAT 5 “was a beastly bomb dropper known for killing balls.” Many felt that the bat generated too much power and gave hitters an unfair performance advantage over pitchers. There were reports of the CAT 5 hitting balls significantly farther than other legal bats.

In addition to performance concerns, there were also worries about the CAT 5 posing a safety risk. As reported by JustBats, only the 33 inch and 34 inch CAT 5 models were ultimately banned. The NCAA and NFHS testing found that these longer length bats generated extremely high exit velocities that could endanger player safety. With some collegiate and high school pitchers still developing, there were fears that liners off the CAT 5 could cause serious injuries.

While the CAT 5 became known as a “legendary” bat amongst players for how far it could hit balls, the exceptional performance came at the cost of competitive fairness and safety. This led to the NCAA and NFHS deciding to ban and decertify the 33 inch and 34 inch models to uphold the integrity and security of the game.

Testing Results

The Marucci CAT 5 initially received approval from the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association and was legal for use under NCAA and NFHS rules. However, subsequent testing at the Sports Science Lab at Washington State University revealed issues with the bat’s performance (Approved Bats | Sports Science Laboratory).

The lab uses the Baseball Bat Coefficient of Restitution (BBCOR) test to measure bat performance. Their testing found that the 33-inch model of the Marucci CAT 5 produced higher than allowed BBCOR scores, indicating it had potential to hit balls faster off the bat. This increased bat performance gave players an unfair performance advantage.

Based on these test results showing the bat exceeded allowable performance limits, the Marucci CAT 5 33-inch model was banned from NCAA and NFHS play effective February 2012 (Approved Bats | Sports Science Laboratory).

Impact on Players

The Marucci Cat 5 quickly became one of the most popular bats among high school and college players after its release in 2011. Many top players chose to swing the Cat 5 due to its reputation for producing some of the longest hits and fastest exit velocities in the game. However, the subsequent ban on the bat in 2012 came as a shock to players who had come to rely on the Cat 5’s performance.

According to discussions on online forums like HS Baseball Web, many players were upset and disappointed by the Cat 5 ban. Some felt the bat gave them an unfair advantage that they now lost. Others argued the bat should remain legal since it had passed initial certification. Several players complained they wasted money investing in a bat that was now useless for high school and collegiate play.

Some players downplayed the ban, saying the Cat 5 was still usable in recreational leagues and practice. But for players competing at higher levels, the ban left them scrambling to find a suitable replacement bat just weeks before the season started. Many opted for the Marucci Cat 4 model, but some players said it lacked the same power and performance as the Cat 5.

While many understood the reasons behind the ban from a fairness standpoint, players who used the Cat 5 still felt the abrupt mid-season ban was poorly handled. The bat’s popularity demonstrated that players enjoyed the on-field results it delivered prior to the ban. Losing the option to swing such a hot bat was a difficult transition for some of the game’s top hitters who had come to rely on the Cat 5’s hitting prowess.

Impact on Marucci

The ban on the CAT 5 had a significant impact on bat manufacturer Marucci. As one of their flagship models, the sudden ban forced the company to respond quickly. Marucci issued a statement saying they were “surprised and disappointed” by the decision and that the bat had passed all previous testing and was fully compliant with standards at the time of production.

Despite their claims, the ban cast doubt over Marucci’s reputation. Some questioned if the CAT 5 was intentionally designed to exploit loopholes in bat regulations to gain a performance advantage. This scrutiny threatened to undermine Marucci’s brand image as a premium, trusted manufacturer. According to sources, the bat ban led to anger and frustration from many customers who had purchased the newly prohibited CAT 5.

To rebuild trust after the CAT 5 controversy, Marucci focused on transparency regarding their design and testing processes. They assured players and families that all their bats underwent rigorous pre-market examination. Marucci also diversified their product line to reduce reliance on any single bat model. With these efforts, Marucci managed to recover in the following years, though the CAT 5 ban caused short-term instability.

Rule Changes

The Marucci Cat 5 bat caused significant rule changes in various leagues after its ban. In the summer of 2011, the NCAA banned the Marucci Cat 5, citing performance enhancement beyond the acceptable limit (https://community.hsbaseballweb.com/topic/marucci-cat-5). This prompted some immediate rule changes.

The NFHS, which governs most high school baseball, adopted a new standard known as the Batted Ball Coefficient of Restitution (BBCOR). This measure limited the trampoline effect and performance of non-wood bats to be comparable to wood (https://cdn1.sportngin.com/attachments/document/96ad-2602680/BAT_Requirements_-_Fall_2022-Spring_2023.pdf). Many youth leagues like Little League also adopted new bat standards after the Marucci Cat 5 ban.

These rule changes standardized non-wood bat regulations across various levels of amateur baseball. The ban and subsequent regulations effectively ended the “arms race” for the highest-performing metal bats.

Ongoing Debate

The ban on the Marucci Cat 5 33″ has sparked continued debate within the baseball community. While governing bodies stand by the decision, some argue the bat does not actually provide an unfair performance advantage.

Those in favor of the ban cite testing results showing the 33” Cat 5 performed better than the maximum allowed under BBCOR standards. They argue this gave players using the bat an unfair edge over opponents. Supporters of the ban say it preserves fairness and integrity in the game.

Opponents argue the ban was an overreaction. They claim real-game data does not show a significant performance advantage with the Cat 5 compared to other BBCOR bats. Some say governing bodies should have worked with Marucci to resolve any potential issues rather than immediately banning the bat outright. They believe the ban hurts players who invested money in the Cat 5.

While the debate continues, the 33” Cat 5 remains prohibited in NCAA and NFHS play. Marucci has since released new models conforming to BBCOR standards. Many hope ongoing discussion leads to fair standards benefitting both players and the game.


In summary, the Marucci Cat 5 baseball bat was initially approved for use in high school and collegiate play in 2011. However, after just one season, the bat was banned from NCAA and NFHS sanctioned games in 2012 due to its performance exceeding the Bat-Ball Coefficient of Restitution (BBCOR) standards. Although the bat had passed initial BBCOR testing, additional testing found its ‘trampoline effect’ and ball speeds broke existing bat regulations. This led to issues around the fairness of competition and safety concerns.

The ban impacted many players who had purchased the popular bat and were forced to adjust to new equipment. It also led Marucci to halt production of the bat and revise their bat designs moving forward. The Cat 5 ban highlighted issues with the bat certification process, leading to stricter BBCOR testing procedures. However, debate continues around how to regulate bat performance while balancing playability and safety. In the end, the Cat 5 ban underscores the ongoing challenges of setting bat standards at the high school and college levels.

Scroll to Top